search
Friday, 2002 May 24, 23:29 — history, politics

sovereignty ≠ liberty

USS Clueless defends American unilateralism again:

[quoting a British paper] “a disdain for any treaty that might, even marginally, tie the administration’s hands”. We in the US refer to that as “liberty”. I know it’s a foreign notion in Europe, but we actually fought a revolution to get it, and we’d like to keep it. We think it’s pretty damned important.

No, that’s sovereignty, not the same thing at all; though Steve is right in saying our ancestors fought a war for it (when they already had considerable liberty). Liberty, on the other hand, is defended precisely by tying the administration’s hands – or so Americans once used to say.

(While I’m up, democracy is also not the same thing as either liberty or sovereignty.)

No comments yet.

Subscribe without commenting

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment