comment
by jonas —
Friday, 2010 September 3, 08:07
As for how, it looks something like approximating something with Taylor Fourier series. As for the why, it looks good, isn’t that enough? I must be missing something though because that doesn’t explain the “heraldry” tag on this blog post.
comment
by Anton —
Friday, 2010 September 3, 09:42
Perhaps I’m the only heraldry fan who reads this blog.
See Line (heraldry) (Wikipedia). The series converges to a line potenty; I wanted to see whether a “low-pass” version of potenty could be nebuly, and indeed #2 through #5 are variant renderings thereof. (Components 3n are zero, so this illustration shows 0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16, 17.)
comment
by Anton —
Monday, 2014 September 1, 21:44
Someone found this image, over and over, with Yandex searches concerning (i think) women’s adrenal hormone function.
As for how, it looks something like approximating something with
TaylorFourier series. As for the why, it looks good, isn’t that enough? I must be missing something though because that doesn’t explain the “heraldry” tag on this blog post.Perhaps I’m the only heraldry fan who reads this blog.
See Line (heraldry) (Wikipedia). The series converges to a line potenty; I wanted to see whether a “low-pass” version of potenty could be nebuly, and indeed #2 through #5 are variant renderings thereof. (Components 3n are zero, so this illustration shows 0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16, 17.)
Someone found this image, over and over, with Yandex searches concerning (i think) women’s adrenal hormone function.