search
Monday, 2002 December 2, 18:07 — spam

*LAUNDER*MONEY*FAST*

I don’t know what to think. Just got an African money-laundering letter that begins:

Dear Sir,
You may have seen this business before and ignored it. I know I did – many times! However,please take a few moments to read this letter.

The sender bears the curious name Robinson Zulu.

What next? Deposit one hundred thousand dollars to each bank account on the list, then open an account at an African bank and make a copy of this letter . . . .

Friday, 2002 November 15, 18:33 — spam

don’t let this golden opportunity . .

I see that Pobox’s spam filter has learned to spot at least some Nigerian scam letters. That must have been tricky, as they vary more and look a lot more like normal mail than most junkmail does.

Tuesday, 2002 November 5, 12:35 — spam

the surreal side of the inbox

Oddest junkmail of the month:

The Illuminati Order would like to invite you to visit with us at:
http://www.illuminatiorder.org

This invitation is at the request of someone who cares about you but she wishes to remain ananymous.

Kind regards,

Grandmaster
The Illuminati Order of Bavaria

P.S. as a special gift, invest in [censored]. It is an illuminati stock which will make you a great deal of money if you buy while it is under $1

The website does not exist, though the domain is registered to someone named Allah Satan’s Bitch.

Another odd one:

Hi my name is Angelica Lyximboorg; I am 22 years of age.
I am new to the internet, and I found your e-mail on one of the news groups.
I was just wondering if you would be kind enough and walk me thru on how to post a massage on the board.
I heard it’s to do something with outlook express or something, I am just a little bit confused and all =)
If you can explain to me how to use the news groups forum that would be great.
Here is my e-mail address which I use daily Angelica22_aAfjGf@hotmail.com

Tuesday, 2002 September 3, 12:12 — spam

11010011

It would appear that a significant number of netizens have taken to rejecting mail from 211.x.x.x, and that the Chinese spammers know it: I got several spams today that advertised a website in China (at least china-motion.com appeared in traceroute) but used a mail relay in the West.

Wednesday, 2002 August 21, 19:33 — spam

who succors the unsought?

It’s ages since I got a spam of the form “For $39.99 we’ll submit your site to 273 top search engines . . . .” Remember them? I always wondered who the heck would buy that service.

Thursday, 2002 August 8, 09:13 — spam

a backward tribe

It had to happen: I just got a “Nigerian scam” letter from someone representing himself as “the secetary of Africa White farmers co-operation (AWFC) OF Zimbabwe.”

Friday, 2002 July 26, 21:27 — spam

it must be profound

Got a spam today which ends thus:

</HTML>
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
Of course, the systematic use of complex symbols suffices to account for the preliminary qualification limit. For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, any associated supporting element is unspecified with respect to an abstract underlying order. It seems to me to be the case that a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort presents a valuable challenge showing the necessity for the naive disprovability hypothesis. So far, the incorporation of additional mission constraints must utilize and be functionally interwoven with the philosophy of commonality and standardization. Notice, incidentally, that a constant flow of field-collected input ordinates may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate any deep configuration mode. Similarly, the notion of level of grammaticalness mandates staff-meeting-level attention to the management-by-contention principle. To provide a constituent structure for T(Z,K), a constant flow of field- collected input ordinates is holistically compounded, in the context of the preliminary qualification limit. For one thing, the independent functional principle is rather different from possible bidirectional logical relationship approaches.
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

How have you lived this long without knowing that?

« Previous PageNext Page »