it’s a post, ain’t it?

a very clever picture — clean, but be warned, much of that site is NSFW.

Bon mot from Sheldon Richman:

Advocates of the free market are sometimes parodied for their seemingly all-purpose answer to any problem: Let the market handle it. What may sound like a simplistic answer, however, is actually the most complex prescription imaginable. In the modern world, the workings of any particular market are so complicated, they are beyond the grasp of mere mortals. Moment by moment, day by day, so many subtly interrelated decisions are made by so many people worldwide that no individual or group could possibly understand the big picture in any detailed way. So there is nothing simplistic about proposing the market as a solution to an economic problem. It’s short way of saying: let the multitude of knowledgeable people seeking profit, risking their own money, and responding to incentives find a solution based on persuasion not force. Translated that way, it sounds like a promising approach.

Ironically, those who don’t appreciate markets are in fact the ones who offer a simplistic, even empty alleged solution to economic problems: government regulation. That phrase is uttered like an incantation, the magical answer to all doubts about how, in the absence of fully free markets, problems would be solved. The irony is that while “let the market handle it” can be unpacked and made specific, “regulation” cannot.

Posted in arts, economics | Leave a comment

to make a mark

Some work of fiction, possibly Varley’s Steel Beach, mentions a service called First Footprints that takes tourists to untrodden parts of the Moon.

I’d pay extra for a temporary inflated tent so as to make bare footprints.

Posted in futures | 3 Comments

Martian months

Most proposed calendars for Mars have 24 months, and various systems have been offered to name them. Here’s one more: use the names of the 24 brightest stars, in order of longitude right ascension (relative to the rotation axis of Mars), so that each star is conspicuous at night in the month named for it. Continue reading

Posted in calendars | Tagged | 4 Comments

hyperreality

Dad has often mentioned that when he first got eyeglasses he was surprised to see that trees had discrete leaves; I never found that to be a big deal.

But now I sometimes find that blades of grass stand out with unnatural vividness. I wonder whether it’s because contacts can give a more accurate correction (because their position is less variable) or because, with this lateral bifocal arrangement, the contrast between sharp and blur is always subconsciously present.

Posted in me!me!me!, psychology | 1 Comment

accumulated miscellany

cause for doubt

By the way, if I ever use the construction The X is just that, a X, slap me.

I found an unintentionally funny bit:

Do you remember the old adage about how power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely? Karl Marx didn’t.

Acton wrote that famous line four years after Marx died. – I always wondered what “corrupts absolutely” is supposed to mean.

The movie of Watchmen apparently changes Ozymandias’s costume from gold to greys. Whose stupid idea was that?

Posted in general | Leave a comment

the Big Whack

Giant impact hypothesis

It has been said (though not in that article) that the Pacific Ocean is the scar of the whack. So if the whack hadn’t happened, would Earth’s crust be all continental? In that case the plates would likely be much less mobile, and most of the big mountains would be volcanic, as on Mars.

Although a big whack may be necessary for plate tectonics as we know it, it’s apparently not sufficient; Mars is also thought to have had one, forming the northern lowlands.

Posted in sciences | 2 Comments

Anita

Anita Rowland, a blogger who linked to this humble effort several times in its more energetic first year, died of cancer in December.

(If I were still in the habit of reading blogs, I might have known that before now.)

Posted in blogdom, fandom | Leave a comment