I’m melting!

Without serious effort, I seem to have lost a tenth of my peak mass in three years. I think the main change is that I no longer eat rice most days.

Posted in me!me!me!, medicine | 2 Comments

more movies

Les Bas-fonds (The Lower Depths) (1936). Not much coherent plot, but some engaging characters. The director Jean Renoir said he made a point of moving the story to the banks of the Marne, but didn’t say why he kept the characters’ Russian names (so odd in French mouths!) and had them spending roubles. — I (or my housemate) rented this once before but I falsely remembered that I didn’t watch it.

The Women (1939). Too long.

Kiru (Kill!) (1968) is said to be derived from the same book as Kurosawa’s Sanjuro; both are about a scruffy ronin who helps some naive young samurai against a corrupt official, and both are quite good and told with humor, but similarity ends there. — The title is a bit of a mystery; I couldn’t identify the kanji.

Mad Max (1979), unlike its sequel, did not hold my interest. Was it more novel thirty years ago?

Raising Arizona (1987). I’d like it better if it did not rely so heavily on mocking a rustic stereotype.

Mies Vailla Menneisyyttä (The Man Without a Past) (2002). A welder on his way to a new job gets off a train, is beaten and robbed, and loses his memory. He begins to rebuild a life, with difficulties because he cannot supply a name; it’s admirable that this is not played for broad comedy or for tragedy. In the end he learns that he’s a better man than his old self.

Finding Nemo (2003) is superb eye-candy, and an absorbing story.

Someone recommended watching these two together, but I don’t know why. Finding Nemo is primarily about a father’s successful quest to recover his son. The welder, rather than seeking his lost name, learns to live without it (though this process is incomplete when his name and past are revealed). Both protagonists are strengthened by adversity, but that describes much of fiction.

Posted in cinema | 1 Comment

fortuitious garble

I mis-heard “California Department of Boating and Waterways” as “…Voting and Lotteries,” which makes its own kind of sense.

Posted in politics | Leave a comment

why walk when you can stagger?

I got AT&T DSL because it’s a third the price of Comcast. Suddenly things go wrong: I can’t write here, or back up this site; I can’t save my edits to a Wikipedia article; and an article at the New York Times never loads. (I’m writing this on Comcast.)

Posted in neep-neep | 5 Comments

a guilt-trip down memory lane

When I lived in Oakland, I was twice approached after sunset by a panhandler who announced, “I’m black but I’m not a mugger!” Both times I flinched and, of course, felt guilty.

It now occurs to me belatedly that, if young adult males are the most violent subset of naked apes, it’s not irrational to be wary of a solitary nocturnal specimen, regardless of his albedo.

So he had a cute racket.

Posted in California, psychology, race | Leave a comment

more meaningless zeros

A quirk in DVD subtitles: a phrase like “ten minutes before seven” is consistently rendered as 10 minutes before 7:00. Why not go all the way and make it 6:50?

I am amused to find that

1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00

takes exactly as many characters as

one two three four five six seven eight nine ten eleven twelve

Posted in cinema, language | Leave a comment

mind tools

Someone recently told me that it’s easier to memorize a sequence, such as a text, from the end: when you recite it you’re moving toward familiar ground. Friday I gave this trick a modest test, when I had to copy a 15-digit number from one place to another. It works.

Saturday I was having a snack in a public place and heard a mother and daughter at the next table speaking French. When the little one looked my way I made chit-chat in French, well enough that the mother asked whether I speak French routinely! In fact this was about my third French conversation in a year (and by far the longest).

Posted in language, me!me!me!, psychology | 1 Comment