i read the funnies so . .

How long had Jon Rosenberg been saving this pun?

“Google is ruining everything.”

Is it me or is Maritza Campos‘s command of English slipping a bit? March 27:

So that’s why you were hiding it from us? What did you think, that we’d start feeling less than [of] you, or something?

April 7:

. . . getting sued for making funny things on the halls is not good for anyone.

May 1:

All’s fun and games until someone pokes an eye out!

(Nothing wrong with this apart from the unidiomatic All’s, but it’s a misquotation of Buffy Summers; perhaps it was twice translated.)

Posted in cartoons | Leave a comment

the panes of perception

Once, years ago, I got new eyeglasses and was startled because the world seemed flat. I had come to rely on blur as a distance cue, and that was suddenly taken from me. The effect was brief; binocularity reasserted itself within a few hours.

I had a similar experience today, leaving a car wash: for a moment I confused the view in the newly clean side-mirror with the forward view around it.

Posted in me!me!me! | Leave a comment

things that go round

weird orbits (cited by John Baez)

rotating infrared Titan

Posted in astronomy, mathematics | Leave a comment

how sick on average?

I’ve been hearing on the radio a statement that hospital emergency rooms in California admit 25 thousand people every hour.

That’s equivalent to the entire population every eight weeks. –??–

Posted in medicine | Leave a comment

I could get a swelled head

Someone wrote to me out of the blue with a mathematical question. Though the statement of the problem was not clear enough for me to solve it, I told him how I’d approach it, and he was happy.

I asked how he found me.

Anton, I was surfing the web, some site came up — cant recall which one, it listed you as a respected expert,

which was the best laugh I’d had all day.

Since the problem had to do with sphere packing, perhaps he found a link to my (loosely related) spherical arrangements page.

Posted in me!me!me! | Leave a comment

cinema 1966

大菩薩峠 (Dai-Bosatsu Pass aka Sword of Doom) (dir. 岡本 喜八,). The fight scenes are more preposterous than average: not only do the red shirts attack the champion one by one rather than rushing him, they seem to be aiming to strike someone two or three paces beyond him.

The Naked Prey (dir. Cornel Wilde). Not available on disc but I saw it once on television. It’s essentially one long chase scene, but a gripping one.

Born Free (dir. James H. Hill, Tom McGowan). Kid stuff, of course. I’m curious about how it was made. Some scenes show Elsa’s personality so distinctly that it’s hard to believe they could be played by a stunt cat; yet they look too good to be “home movies” shot by Adamson.

Alfie (dir. Lewis Gilbert); Georgy Girl (dir. Silvio Narizzano). Similar enough in content and tone that I wonder, what from recent years is most comparable to these?

座頭市の歌が聞える (Zatoichi’s Vengeance, #13, dir. Tanaka Tokuzo). Even more formulaic than most of the series.

The Russians Are Coming, The Russians Are Coming (dir. Norman Jewison). Likable farce. I saw it as a child and remembered almost nothing. — Jonathan Winters has a supporting role, and as usual I could do without. I can think of two movies in which he wasn’t mugging all the time: in The Loved One he played two roles, one of which had to have some different mannerisms, and in Oh Dad, Poor Dad, Mama’s Hung You in the Closet and I’m Feeling So Sad he played a dead body (narrating to us from Beyond).

The Endless Summer (dir. Bruce Brown), a famous documentary on surfing: pretty but monotonous.

座頭市海を渡る (Zatoichi’s Pilgrimage, #14, dir. Ikehiro Kazuo) — For some reason this one is controlled (at least for the US) by a different company from the others in the series, and is not available with English subtitles.

The Fortune Cookie: your standard Billy Wilder comedy, which is no bad thing.

The Professionals (dir. Richard Brooks). A pretty good Western in the vein of The Magnificent Seven.

Ostře sledované vlaky (Closely Watched Trains) (dir. Jiří Menzel). A coming-of-age story in occupied Böhmen und Mahren. A doctor tells young Milos that he suffers from ejaculatio præcox, and Milos repeats the phrase to several people – but in the subtitles the Latin (which I didn’t notice until the last time) was put into English, wrecking the humor and some of the plausibility. I suspect that was not the only thing lost in translation.

A Man for All Seasons (dir. Fred Zinnemann). Excellent.

El Dorado (dir. Howard Hawks). Mediocre.

Il Buono, il Brutto, il Cattivo (The Good, the Bad and the Ugly) (dir. Sergio Leone). Seriously flawed, in that much of the plot follows from “good” Blondie’s frivolous betrayal of “ugly” Tuco. The latter half, after the quest gets going in earnest, is pretty good, but I still prefer Leone’s C’era una volta il West (1968).

Posted in cinema | 1 Comment

QotD

Solutions to this [public goods] problem in the context of basic research are discussed at some length by Terence Kealey. (The Economic Laws of Scientific Research, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1996) Knowledge of current cutting edge research – Kealey’s field is biology – is of considerable value, and it is not the sort of knowledge easily summed up on a one page memo. In practice, the knowledge is largely restricted to the people doing the research, both because they are the ones who can understand each other’s work and because they are the ones that the other researchers want to talk to. That makes such researchers valuable employees and consultants for firms and universities. While the researchers are unlikely to internalize the entire value of the information they produce, they may internalize enough so that the resulting income, along with nonpecuniary rewards of their work, make their research worth doing for them, and subsidizing for firms and universities. Kealey’s conclusion, looking at several different fields where government subsidies went from near zero to very substantial, was that there was no observable effect on the rate of progress in the field. One might interpret that as evidence that the cost of misallocation of resources through the political mechanism – diverting smart people into whatever field looked good in the popular imagination at the moment – at least balanced the benefit of the additional money.

David Friedman: Do We Need a Government? Emphasis added. (It’s easier to read in the December 2005 issue of Liberty, because David’s file uses nonstandard encoding for characters such as dash and apostrophe.)

Posted in politics, sciences | Leave a comment