US v Rosenthal

No surprise here: ‘Guru of Ganja’ Found Guilty of Federal Marijuana Charges. (Link from Rational Review.)

Deliberating for a day, the 12-member jury concluded that Rosenthal, the self-described “Guru of Ganja,” was growing more than 1,000 plants, conspiring to cultivate marijuana and maintaining a warehouse for a growing operation. He faces 10 years to life when sentenced June 4.
. . . .
Under strict orders from U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer, Rosenthal couldn’t tell the jury he was growing pot as “an officer” for Oakland’s medical marijuana program.
. . . .
“There is no such thing as medical marijuana,” said Richard Meyer, a DEA spokesman. “We’re Americans first, Californians second.”

That’s interesting epistemology.

Outside the courtroom, jury foreman Charles Sackett III said jurors suspected Rosenthal was growing medical marijuana, since a host of protesters outside the courthouse held constant demonstrations.

Sackett, however, said the jury followed federal law when it reached its “tough decision.”

“We had no legal wiggle room,” Sackett said. When asked if he hoped the verdicts would be overturned on appeal, Sackett replied: “Personally, yes, I do.”

Does anyone believe an appeal will get anywhere? Every Federal drug law obviously violates the Ninth and Tenth Amendments; but judges practically never enforce either of those quaint clauses. It’s high time for jurors to remember the Nuremberg Principle and resume enforcing the Bill of Rights on their own initiative.

Posted in constitution, drugwar, medicine | Leave a comment

looking at us from Cydonia

Found in the archives, 1998 April 06:

JPL has now released a processed image of the Face on Mars. . . . It looks nothing like a face.

Is too! It’s a face whose left side shows the ravages of some disease, demonstrating that the Martians were/are more enlightened than us: not ashamed to look squarely at those who are less “perfect”, but able to see beyond the fleshly shell to the true beauty within. Truly we have much to learn from our Barsoomite brethren.

Posted in astronomy, humanities | Leave a comment

don’t sing at me, that’s all I ask

AnyBirthday will tell you my birthdate and zipcode as of 1983, if you know how I spelled my name in those days. Should I be disturbed?

Posted in general | Leave a comment

here’s Cal Worthington . . .

Fascinating article. Boston Globe Online / Health | Science / A mystery in black and white

Charles Darwin wrote: “Not a single domestic animal can be named which has not in some country drooping ears.” Not just dog breeds, but goat, llama, rabbit and even cat breeds sport flopped-over ears. Ears are just the start. The large black-and-white patches typical of dairy cows and pinto horses, not to mention dogs, cats, and rabbits, do not exist in their wild counterparts. And domestic animals characteristically have smaller heads, teeth, and horns, and go into heat more frequently.

What is remarkable about these differences is that they are so universal. The same traits are common to species as different as cats from cows, rabbits from dogs.

While the old explanation has been to say that people wanted these different traits and selectively bred for them (Who wouldn’t want a bull with shorter horns?), the global nature of the changes casts some doubt. To that, add this: No wild animals exhibit these traits. How would people even think to want pintos when there weren’t any spotted horses around in the first place?

Cited by Rand Simberg.

Posted in sciences | 1 Comment

meet Alec Rawls

An Un-republican Form of Government

In 1987, the California Sheriffs Association sponsored a bill in the state legislature to ban its electoral competition. Since then, only current or recent members of the law enforcement establishment have been allowed to run for Sheriff in California.
. . .
It is as if prosecutors had banned their main electoral opposition by getting the legislature to pass a law against defense attorneys running for District Attorney, requiring all candidates to be members of the prosecutor’s office. Somebody ought to sue.

That somebody is me.

There is much else of interest.

Posted in constitution | Leave a comment

meet Madhu Kurup

Thursday I had dinner with Madhu Kurup at Amarin, a Thai restaurant in Mountain View which neither of us had tried before; he didn’t comment on his, but my dish (spicy chicken with cashews) was quite satisfactory.

If you read his flattery of me, remember that it takes two to make lively conversation.

I found his Livejournal (incidentally he looks nothing like the photograph) indirectly: my log shows hits from four ‘friends’ pages which carried his report. It’s a bit of a shock to dip into foreigners’ informal writings in English but peppered with strange words; it makes me worry that my own writing might be made unnecessarily obscure by local jargon. What is the right balance? Does anyone whose English is weak read my site?

I took Madhu’s suggestion to try Google Sets on my favorite music. I found that it helps to pre-filter my entries; if the initial set is too diverse, the narrow result is nothing and the broad result is effectively useless.

Posted in California, humanities, me!me!me! | Leave a comment

meet Mary Rosh

Oh dear: John Lott, scholar-darling of the Gun Lobby, may be dirty. (Julian Sanchez of Cato broke the story.) I hope the Gun Lobby (statist-speak for all of us who don’t buy the victim-punishing dogma of Feinstein, Schumer, Brady et al.) will have the sense to disown him if necessary. On the other hand, of course, despite the ‘Mary Rosh’ affair I hope the sunlight will ultimately show his work to be clean.

The worst outcome of this matter – coming on the heels of the Bellesiles scandal – would be to discourage serious social scientists from looking at gun issues, leaving nothing but a war of slogans.

Posted in humanities, politics, weapons | Leave a comment