separated at germination?

Okay, the mascot of OurWaterOurWorld isn’t quite as similar to Bob the Angry Flower as I thought, but still …

Posted in arts | Tagged | Leave a comment

what’s in a name?

“You enjoyed Lost in Austen, didn’t you?”

“Sure. I also enjoy Austen in Lost.”

Posted in cinema | Leave a comment

life imitates embryonic blog-post

Pillow brought home a little brown snake, about a foot long – the size of the biggest earthworms I’ve ever seen. I put it out in the grass, for the cycle to begin anew.

A few hours later, as I was composing the above in my head, I saw the same(?) snake in the living-room again, now dead from obvious trauma.

Posted in pets | Leave a comment

spam dialect

Who writes this stuff?

A venerable insurance company within the underlying market of operation, is proud to announce yet another feasible entry for uprising accounting adepts.

Comfort working environment will most definitely justify the necessity to excel in the vast sphere of professional goals, and thereof lay a firm foundation for your career advancement.

Salient associates, with profound work knowledge, will assist you in unwrapping avocation related techniques, which will best integrate with the development and popularization of high-caliber insurance solutions.

Feel free to consider the prerequisites table right below, to amass the important information.

Posted in language, spam | 1 Comment

readme

I’ve redone this site’s front page to include an appeal for help in finding work, and incidentally to remove some clutter.

Posted in me!me!me! | Leave a comment

unexpected aspects of asymmetry

My left arm is very sore today, making me notice how many little things I habitually do with my ‘wrong’ hand. I wonder whether this says something about my brain.

They say women’s hemispheres are less specialized; maybe my partial ambidexterity, the weak dominance of my left eye, and the sparseness of my body hair are all related.

Posted in me!me!me!, medicine | Leave a comment

whether ’tis nobler in the mind to doubly miss the point

A little incident in folk grammar, funny to me at least. I wrote a sentence containing

. . . which led to reconstructing in my mind . . .

because

. . . which led to mentally reconstructing . . .

seemed wrong: everyone knows you don’t put an adverb between to and a verb form! (You’ll note that to reconstructing is not an infinitive, so the ‘rule’ does not apply.)

When I became consciously aware of that confused subconscious reasoning, I changed it to the latter.

I wonder how many now-standard grammatical features we owe to such extensions of misunderstanding.

Posted in language | 1 Comment