overspecialization

When I returned from fetching her tacos and Hostess Sno-Balls, my One True Ex quoted a familiar aphorism. I asked who said it; she didn’t know; so I googled and found it attributed to one Ernestine Ulmer. Who? So I searched for “Ernestine Ulmer”, and found the name mentioned in one obituary and a couple of genealogy sites – and cited fifty times for the aphorism.

Posted in humanities | Leave a comment

funnies

Here’s a webtoon I haven’t plugged before: Something Positive. Others recently read: Wigu; Rusty Shrapnel; Megatokyo.

Also volatile: GirlHacker’s Random Log

Posted in cartoons | Leave a comment

is shareware still infected?

Heather Madrone has an interesting question.

My 13-year-old daughter downloaded some software this week. I asked her to check with me next time, so I could show her how to scan it for viruses before she installs it. Then I thought, “Now wait a minute. Can you still get viruses from downloading software?”

Back in the bad old days, viruses infected programs, and were handed around on diskettes or via download. When they infected your system, they might hitch a ride on another piece of software. I haven’t heard of a virus propagating itself that way in years.

So what’s the scoop? Does it still happen? Or is email such a superior tool for virus propagation that virus creators have given up on slipping viruses into software? Are download sites too well-protected for a virus to slip by their defenses?

Posted in neep-neep | 1 Comment

science, journalism and opinion

John Derbyshire:

(Like any honest reactionary, I loathe the [New York] Times. I must give them credit, though, for their coverage of math and science, which is way above that of any other newspaper I know, except the even more politically deplorable London [sic] Guardian, which leads the world in this field. Why can’t conservative newspapers “do” science and math?)

One obvious hypothesis lies in the stereotype of Right and Left attitudes to Science – not that scientists don’t include all political tribes, but the Left believes in the power of Science to Improve Humanity, while the Right’s stereotypical attitude may be summed up with “leave the boffins to their fun” and Thoreau’s “If I knew a man was coming to my house with the fixed intention of doing me good, I would run for my life.” To such a Rightist, science is irrelevant to the function of the mass press, which is to keep an eye on the politicians.

Is that too obvious and stereotypical to be plausible?

(Link from Dave Trowbridge.)

Posted in humanities, politics, sciences | 1 Comment

the job thing

Had a job interview today at a lawfirm which does consumer class actions in anti-trust — a field which I find ethically dodgy.

I’d like to get out of law entirely, and work in a business with real customers and some sense of cumulative progress. But who else will pay me $25/hour to sit and bang the keys?

Posted in me!me!me! | 1 Comment

necessary and sufficient conditions

Tibor Machan misreads the Declaration of Independence:

It requires “a long train of abuses and usurpations,” which reduce a government to “absolute despotism,” before secession is justified.

On the contrary, the sentence containing that phrase states a sufficient condition. The necessary condition is stated in a more famous sentence:

We hold these Truths to be self-evident, . . . that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it . . . . Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient Causes . . . . But when a long Train of Abuses and Usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a Design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their Right, it is their Duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future Security.

In other words:
Secession is legitimized by any state act that tends to weaken, rather than defend, the rights of the people. A revolt over trifles is not illegitimate, but it is unwise; better the devil you know. Yet the conditions complained of were so severe, so far beyond “light and transient”, as to make secession not only legitimate but mandatory.

Posted in history | 1 Comment

two marvels today

. . the bank machine gave me an old-style $twenty, the first I’d seen in months; and I saw a squirrel burying seeds (conifer), which I can’t recall ever seeing before.

Posted in California | Leave a comment