I can see your house

View from high above a neighborhood where I spent quite a lot of time between 1971 and 1981; much has changed since then.

Elsewhere: Dad’s house, which is new, is not visible – I can’t even identify his street. 2004: The source pictures have been updated, and it’s there now.

Posted in California, eye-candy, technology | 2 Comments

pain matters

I’m surprised to find that this blog has not previously mentioned the problem of undermedication for pain, a side-effect of the War On Minority Drugs. Here is a personal anecdote.

After seeing first-hand the lack of understanding and willingness to treat pain, I’m surprised the suicide rate of these sufferers is only [nine times] the national average.

Posted in drugwar | Leave a comment

a formerly original thinker

Brian Doherty writes in Reason:

Obscurity is indeed the friend of much of the world’s evil, as [David] Brin insists when he rails that “financial privacy” concerns are just camouflage for drug dealers and tax evaders.

Am I the only one thinking non sequitur? Drug dealers and tax evaders are the good guys.

Posted in tax+privacy | Leave a comment

grrr

I have a touch of fever, and hope that is why my mood has been brittle the last few days.

(later) I see that Madhu is having a hard week too.

Posted in me!me!me! | Leave a comment

fair’s fair

Boobage gallery to raise money for mammograms. Where’s the corresponding collection of prostate pix?

Posted in eye-candy | Leave a comment

the vagaries of fame

Weird. In the last few months I dropped from eighth to 53d most googlable “Sherwood”; now I’m back at eighth. I’m also the sixth “Anton”, my highest ever (by one).

Posted in me!me!me!, spambait | Leave a comment

the hypocrisy of Guantánamo

In a comment to The Fat Guy, one James Rummel whines:

Sure, there has to be constant vigilence to avoid abuses of power. But most of them are up in arms because of actions against non-nationals, sometimes even POW’s captured on a battlefield!

An interesting choice of words. Is it not the position of the White House that these guys have no rights because they are not really POWs under the Conventions?

Last time I checked these guys never made a “social bargain” with the US. Saying that we have to treat the entire world with the same consideration as our own citizens would hamper efforts to end the threat to innocent people.

I know no words strong enough to express my disgust.
Continue reading

Posted in race | Leave a comment