Monthly Archives: February 2003

I could turn this into a rant against nanny-statism

Bruce Tognazzini says: When children sitting in front seats of cars were killed by airbags, the experts decreed that children henceforth shall sit in special chairs in the back. Problem: out of sight too often leads to out of mind; … Continue reading

Posted in general | Leave a comment

“I know what boys like”

From the mailbox: P.P.S. Google’s spelling correction is getting pretty powerful. I typed “alyssa milano” and it responded “Did you mean alyssa milano nude?” It didn’t work for me.

Posted in general | Leave a comment

another hundred bullets

Sunday I went to a target range for the first time in many months. I had what I call a left-handed day, when my ‘weak’ hand was much steadier than my ‘strong’ hand. (On average I’m nearly as accurate with … Continue reading

Posted in me!me!me!, weapons | Leave a comment

US v Rosenthal

No surprise here: ‘Guru of Ganja’ Found Guilty of Federal Marijuana Charges. (Link from Rational Review.) Deliberating for a day, the 12-member jury concluded that Rosenthal, the self-described “Guru of Ganja,” was growing more than 1,000 plants, conspiring to cultivate … Continue reading

Posted in constitution, drugwar, medicine | Leave a comment

looking at us from Cydonia

Found in the archives, 1998 April 06: JPL has now released a processed image of the Face on Mars. . . . It looks nothing like a face. Is too! It’s a face whose left side shows the ravages of some disease, … Continue reading

Posted in astronomy, humanities | Leave a comment

don’t sing at me, that’s all I ask

AnyBirthday will tell you my birthdate and zipcode as of 1983, if you know how I spelled my name in those days. Should I be disturbed?

Posted in general | Leave a comment

here’s Cal Worthington . . .

Fascinating article. Boston Globe Online / Health | Science / A mystery in black and white Charles Darwin wrote: “Not a single domestic animal can be named which has not in some country drooping ears.” Not just dog breeds, but … Continue reading

Posted in sciences | 1 Comment