Obie was making sure

A week or two ago I wrote to a friend in jail. Uncertain what resources might be available to him, I enclosed a stamped return envelope. The letter came back, marked “RETURN TO SENDER / UNAUTHORIZED MAIL”; it had been slit open and crudely closed with a little piece of tape, and contained a checklist which may be useful to any of you who may know a guest of the Solano County Sheriff’s Office.

This letter / item is being returned to you for the following reason(s):

  • Photographs depicting gangs / weapons / unlawful activity/ sexually explicit. Limited to 5 photographs; no negatives, slides, Polaroid’s, sticker photos, frames or albums, nude or partially nude photos. Photo size limit 4″x7″.
  • Books, soft-cover only, must be sent directly from the publisher / vendor.
  • Newspapers and magazines must be purchased by subscription in the inmate’s name and must come directly from the publisher.
  • No pens / pencils, envelopes (metered, plain or stamped) postage stamps or stationary.
  • No cash / personal checks accepted. Money Orders must be legible and filled out completely.
  • Inmate to inmate mail not approved by the Facility Commander. No Third party mail.
  • Item cannot be searched without being destroyed.
  • Item contains metal, wood, plastic, cloth, cardboard, paint, crayon, perfume, lipstick, stickers, glitter, tape, glue, power, liquid paper stains or unknown substances.
  • Greeting Card size limit is 9″x12″.
  • Limit of 5 (newspaper or magazines) clippings or photocopies.
  • Packages must have prior approval of the Facility Commander.
  • Drawings depicting gang weapons, sexually explicit and/or unlawful activity.
  • No hair, maps, jewelry, catalogs, posters, lottery tickets, candy, trading cards, magnets, condoms, ID cards, stencils/tattoo patterns, date/address books or other ___________________________.

I copied the list as literally as I can, including the quaint msplngs; except that instead of bullets the list has ‘__’ (which I don’t know how to imitate in HTML). Note the hesitation between positive and negative in these commandments; pity the person who tries to obey them literally. It’s true that my letter contained “No hair,” etc, but is that really why it was returned?

Posted in security theater | Leave a comment

potential terrorist thwarted!

As a favor to my dearest friend, I went today to the Federal Building in San Francisco to drop off a piece of paper.

I cleverly left my pocket-knife behind (and missed it twice) but, addled by a lifetime of drug abuse and masturbation, neglected to bring along an annotated wallet-size portrait of myself. (In the normal course of life, I may go weeks without needing to back up my claim to a name.)

Hurry home. Get the stupid piece of laminated paper. Hurry back. ($16 for the round trip.) Nine minutes too late for my errand, though the building was still open. The U.S.Marshal at the gate compared my face to the even surlier smaller version, but did not take a note of my name or check it against a list.

Picking a quarrel with an underling might have been entertaining at first, but it would bring me no satisfaction (I’m learning!), so I asked him instead to identify someone in a position to explain to me why such a policy was not a pointless waste of his time and mine. He was sympathetic and helpful on that point; perhaps relieved that I did not make more of a scene? The party I want is the head of the Marshals Service.

The trip was not a total loss: I had a satisfying Vietnamese lunch at Golden House, which would be in the shadow of the Fed Bldg if the sun were in the northwest.

Posted in security theater | 1 Comment

less geeky than thou

The Geek Hierarchy. Referred orally(!) by John Grigsby.

Posted in fandom | Leave a comment

by a mountain lake

This weekend’s activities included sitting on a tree stump by the shore of Lake Tahoe. Lesson learned: Sap can be sticky for quite a long time.

At some angles, the water looked strangely metallic to me; unlike the dark green sea-water around San Francisco. One of my companions remarked that those of us without polarized glasses missed seeing down into the water.

Posted in general | Leave a comment

Spleen, Venting, Department of.

In the past eight days I’ve received nine spams from CustomOffers, identical in form but varying in content. I have relayed each to its provider Exodus, but got no response (other than from the bot); perhaps everyone there is too busy being acquired by CW. I therefore resolve never to do business with either of them.

It especially honks me off when spammers use bugs, of the form <img height=”1″ width=”1″ src=”http://shameless.parasite.com/whitepixel.gif?email=target.address”>. This shows up as a dot, but its real purpose is to appear in the sender’s web-traffic log as a sign that your address is valid.

Oh well. This came to my JPS address (rather than through Pobox), and I mean to find another dialup provider anyway.

In 1999 Earthlink acquired Mindspring, which had previously acquired Netcom. Netcom’s list-servers were transferred to Earthlink, but a couple of blunders were made, with the result that the next time a message went through the dormant list digital-anarchy@netcom.com all subscribers got a recursive cascade of thousands of bounces — and I could not unsub. (The list owner was a ghost.) After a couple of days of non-response from support@earthlink, I redirected my mail to that address. A few months later I no longer needed a shell account anyway, so I became an ex-customer.

My other (PPP) provider, JPS, was also eventually swallowed by Earthlink, which proceeded to lose my website. Again, no help, so I sought a new and better webhost (serve-you.net), but kept my dialup account for the time being since it was prepaid for several months. Now that has run out, and I notice that Earthlink’s rate ($21.95) is rather high, particularly for a feed that sometimes crashes every few minutes.

If you’re in Alameda County and happy with your dialup provider, please let me know. I don’t need mail or webspace.

Posted in neep-neep | Leave a comment

hyperbolic, baby!

Pretty things: hyperbolic planar tesselations by Don Hatch. Presented in the conformal Poincaré disc mapping, which is the most common; it’s analogous to stereographic projection of a sphere. Another favorite mapping is the half-plane, which has no analogue that I can think of.

But I’ve never seen a conformal ‘Mercator’ mapping, preserving one line. Instead of a circle, the infinite hyperbolic plane would become an infintely long but finitely wide strip; Escher’s Circle Limit, transformed through such a projection, would make a nifty frieze (or runner rug).

Sadly I’ve yet to find enough information (clear enough for my lazy mind) on doing stuff in hyperbolic space.

Posted in eye-candy, mathematics | 2 Comments

the Senator from Low Earth Orbit

People say a lot of unkind things about John Glenn, and I won’t rule out the possibility that there might be good reasons for that. But I’d like to record that he did one good thing that I’ll never forget.

Seven years ago, a Republican majority had just taken power in Congress, threatening a number of reforms, including a rule that all legislation must carry a preamble specifying its Constitutional authority. If I am not misinformed, it was the Senator from Low Earth Orbit who naïvely blurted, “But that would make most of what we do illegal!”

Posted in constitution | Leave a comment