watching the talkies

I watched half of Don’t Bother to Knock (1952) and found none of the characters at all interesting.

My housemate and I both enjoyed Outside Edge (1994), a series about two contrasting couples (Brenda Blethyn and Robert Daws; Josie Lawrence and Timothy Spall) brought together by cricket.

In High Noon (1952) Grace Kelly often sounds as if English is not her first language. — Did gummed envelopes exist in 1876? (The date is limited by a flag of 37 stars.)

Posted in cinema | Leave a comment

wish I could help

Someone recently found my mathematical doodles page by searching for analemma golden ratio. I hope the visitor was enlightened, but as far as I know there’s no relation between the golden ratio and the analemma!

Posted in mathematics, me!me!me! | Leave a comment

$2.56 and counting

Subject: The Concept of a Meta-Font
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 03:18:42 -0700
From: Anton Sherwood
To: knuth-bug

Digital Typography page 312, near the middle of note [11]

759,499,667,966,482 [ = 2 * 19 * 3717809 * 5375971 ]

should be

759,499,667,166,482 [ = 2 * 11^14 ]

The same error is listed as corrected in Selected Papers page 41.

Today I received the coveted bounty. Woohoo!

Posted in me!me!me!, neep-neep | 1 Comment

better than average as unelected rulers go

Will Wilkinson on State Autonomy and Electoral Triviality

I once went on a date with an EPA lawyer. I said to her, more or less, this is my guess about what you do . . . A new environmental law is passed. The EPA people decide whether they like it or not. If they like it, they enforce it. If they don’t like it, they think, “What would we like the law to mean?” They then try to find a way of interpreting the language to reflect their, rather than congress’s preferences. The lawyers then think about who will sue them if they interpret the law this way, and whether they would win the suit. If they can’t win, they reinterpret it in a way that maybe doesn’t reflect their preferences as much, but which is more likely to stand up in court. Once they’ve got a winner, they implement, and prepare for the likely suit.

She said, “That’s almost exactly what I do.”

Posted in politics | Leave a comment

gummint culture

Christopher Westley: Why Be Proud of Government Work?

Recently, when walking home from work, I was passed by one of those red monster pick-up trucks with an oversized bumper sticker on the back window that announced: FORMER MARINE.

It made me wonder why it is that Marines are the only federal employees who feel the urge to proclaim that they once were paid with taxpayer loot. You never see Volkswagens buzzing around town with a sign that says FORMER POSTAL WORKER, or Lexuses chugging down the street with a sticker proclaiming FORMER FEDERAL FISHERIES STAFF ACCOUNTANT.

Posted in politics | Leave a comment

the price of pot

Educated Guesswork relays graphs – purporting to be from the ONDCP, no less – showing that the retail prices of heroin, cocaïne and methamphetamine (as adjusted for purity as well as currency inflation) declined fairly steadily between 1981 and 2001, while THC (marijuana) peaked in 1991 and has since returned to near its 1981 price.

Remind me again, is the objective of the DEA to make drugs more or less available?

Posted in drugwar, economics | Leave a comment

why he calls it “Twinkie Defense” is beyond me

Friend Perry Metzger begins the bloguine.

Posted in blogdom, futures | 1 Comment