. . . muttered the ogre

neologism

Posted on Tuesday, 2002 March 19 by Anton

Did I really write “satiral” yesterday? Funny. Wonder why that isn’t a proper word, anyway.

Posted in language | Leave a comment

gloom update

Posted on Tuesday, 2002 March 19 by Anton

Three months out of work. Occasional nibbles from agencies but no follow-up. (And all because for the last dozen years I used WordPerfect rather than bloody Redmondware. To think that, last time around, the temp agencies were fighting over me because they knew I can tackle an app I’ve never seen before and, by the end of the day, know it better than most users ever will.)

Invisible walls closing in. Sleep erratic. Familiar symptoms of serotonin deficiency hard to distinguish from familiar symptoms of objective disappointment. Thoughts dwell on friends who died of it: Dan Alderson (1941-89), who allowed diabetes to do him in slowly; and Sasha Chislenko (1959-2000), who took a speedier way. Remind self that at least two people would miss me.

Will try not to bore you further. About that, at least.

Posted in bitterness | Leave a comment

not unexpected

Posted on Tuesday, 2002 March 19 by Anton

Imagine my lack of utter shock at receiving no response to my inquiry to Washington concerning security at the Fed Bldg.

Posted in security theater | Leave a comment

The Fightin’ Stereotypes

Posted on Monday, 2002 March 18 by Anton

An intramural basketball team in Colorado has named itself the Fighting Whites, in satiral response to the Fighting Reds.

Is this the moment to mention that in hi-skool I was on an intramural tag-football team called the Chinks? (I think Max Wei proposed the name, but it might have been Mike Mueller or Chris Chow.)

Posted in humanities | Leave a comment

manufacturing consensus

Posted on Sunday, 2002 March 17 by Anton

Vernor Vinge’s mind-expanding novel A Fire Upon the Deep (1992) contains numerous postings on “the Net of a Million Lies.” But unlike the Usenet of our time, most of the senders have institutional names, like Khurvark University or Sandor Arbitration. I have assumed that these represent consensus cooked up by AIs from internal discussions.

Now Sean Kirby says that Columbia Newsblaster (a project of the Natural Language Processing Group at Columbia University) automatically “trolls hundreds of news sites, collects all the information from the articles, and summarizes them with links . . . . its computer-generated summaries are virtually free from any possible taint of bias.”

Oh? Newsblaster itself lists seventeen sources (Yahoo, ABCNews, CNN, Reuters, LA Times, CBS News, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, Virtual New York, Washington Post, Wired, FOX News, NY Post, USA Today, Science Magazine, BBC News, Nature Magazine, Lycos) some of which repeat each other; Yahoo and Lycos get most of their stuff from Reuters. The summary will be as unbiased as the median of mainstream news; that beats reading just one paper, but is it revolutionary?

Unfortunately there’s no obvious link to information on how Newsblaster works.

Posted in neep-neep, prose | Leave a comment