. . . muttered the ogre

Got a spam today which ends thus:

</HTML>
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
Of course, the systematic use of complex symbols suffices to account for the preliminary qualification limit. For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, any associated supporting element is unspecified with respect to an abstract underlying order. It seems to me to be the case that a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort presents a valuable challenge showing the necessity for the naive disprovability hypothesis. So far, the incorporation of additional mission constraints must utilize and be functionally interwoven with the philosophy of commonality and standardization. Notice, incidentally, that a constant flow of field-collected input ordinates may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate any deep configuration mode. Similarly, the notion of level of grammaticalness mandates staff-meeting-level attention to the management-by-contention principle. To provide a constituent structure for T(Z,K), a constant flow of field- collected input ordinates is holistically compounded, in the context of the preliminary qualification limit. For one thing, the independent functional principle is rather different from possible bidirectional logical relationship approaches.
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

How have you lived this long without knowing that?