I’m just askin’

Has anyone ever put a suicide note in a blog, fanzine, Usenet or the like?

Posted in general | Leave a comment

Deena Gilbey’s visa

Mark Steyn puts the INS on the carpet. (Link from Iain Murray.)

The lesson, boys and girls, is this: When you grant the power to do something, you grant the power to do it wrong; and the more complicated the mission that goes with that power, the less likely the agency is to make everyone happy.

Now I say the People have no more right to tell you whom you may or may not have as an employee or tenant or mate on the grounds of place of birth than on grounds of religion or color. For those who need it spelled out: As a libertarian I demand open borders. (Explanations that labor-protectionism is merely defending property against trespassers will be ignored.)

The Constitution authorizes Congress to “establish an uniform rule of naturalization”, i.e. consistent criteria for the status of citizen, which is a far cry from creating a maze of rules about who may do what in the US in peacetime. Some folks tell me that every government has laws restricting immigration; implying that, where the Constitution is silent, the new government ought to behave just like other governments. I don’t think the people who ratified the Constitution (and thereby gave the new regime conditional permission to exist) would agree with such a theory.

But I’ll put on my moderate hat for a moment. Let’s do away with the alphabet of visa-classes, with their contradictory qualifications, and give the INS a rulebook something like this: “Foreign nationals are classified as follows.

  • “Class A: [qualifications] Aliens of class A may enter or leave the US whenever they please, for any lawful purpose, until they disqualify themselves.
  • “Class B: . . . Aliens of class B may be in the US, for any lawful purpose, for a total of one year every two years.
  • “Class C: . . . Aliens of class C may enter the US under the following circumstances . . .
  • “Class D: . . . Aliens of class D are not welcome.”

Throw out the distinctions between tourists, students, employees, investors and so on (this is what bit Mrs Gilbey). Throw out the weird procedures under which the applicant must be in the US at this stage and out at that stage. The only exclusions or deportations ought to be for criminality, hostile nationality, and perhaps a couple of other things that don’t come to mind right now.

Posted in race | Leave a comment

size did matter

. . to Marie-Antoinette. Hm. Of course The Saga of Burnt Njal was kicked off by a similar incompatibility.

Posted in history | Leave a comment

“a pack, not a herd”

Duncan Frissell:

On September 11th, our president could have gone on national TV and said, “I call upon all armed citizens to load their weapons, and go outside to secure their communities against terrorists. Under the emergency powers granted to me, I hereby suspend all federal[,] state and local regulations against the possession and carrying of firearms.” Large chunks of the US would have been safe from terrorists. Then the government could have concentrated on the disarmed bits like airliners and so forth. Make their job much easier.

And Senator Feinstein would screech about state sovereignty; that’s worth a heap of bonus points.

Posted in politics, weapons | Leave a comment

call me primitive

Teresa Nielsen Hayden greets me with:

Hi there. Looks like you’re using barfy ol’ Netscape 4.x. I don’t want to seem unkind or rejecting, but it’s a real pain to design a web page that’ll work with Netscape 4. . . .

Funny, I seem to have managed it (better) without half trying. Oh well, better that attitude than Bennett’s ‘get lost’.

As for why I’m still using barfy ol’ 4.79: it works for me, dammit. (Most of the time.) Housekeeping – managing bookmarks and mail – is much smoother than in NS6. For example: In NS4, if I’m reading mail and decide not to deal with the current item just now, I hit ‘u’ (for mark-as-Unread). That’s not even on the menu in NS6; I have to take the mouse to another window, figure out which entry there matches what I’m reading, and click a tiny icon. A petty matter, but ease-of-use is made of such minutiae.

NS6 Mail cannot respond properly to a digest – it thoughtfully cuts off everything after the first sig-bar (any line consisting only of “−− “); but that doesn’t matter, because there’s no way to tell it that my SMTP (outgoing mail) server is not the same as my POP (incoming mail) server!

TNH continues:

In the meantime, this raw-text version of my weblog should be accessible to just about everyone. It won’t be pretty, but it should be readable. Sorry about that. . . .

Furrfu!

Posted in neep-neep | Leave a comment

same but not same

Some say rebuild the towers exactly as they were. Some say leave their footprints bare. Seems to me you can have both: rotate the plan by a quarter-turn.

Posted in arts, history | Leave a comment

proud alumni of Wassamatta U.

Jane Galt comments on the boorishness of Americans as seen by Europe: inter alia,

They wear sweatshirts with the names of their colleges on them.

Well, I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: Heh.

American college sweatshirts were immensely popular in Europe in the Seventies. I used to see fake ones in Lausanne shop windows. (I knew they were fake because one of them said ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY around the seal – accurate, i believe – of the University of Illinois.) Somewhere on our family tour in 1975 we got a book of Lego designs in which the only words (other than LEGO) were UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CLARA on a child’s sweatshirt – not the school’s logo (even fake), mind you, but spelled out in custom iron-on letters!

Posted in humanities | Leave a comment