pity my aging eyes

I’m getting very tired of light-on-dark webpages.

Posted in general | Leave a comment

foo

Bad advice, running around loose.

In utterly unrelated news: This week I shared an office with someone who sounds to me as if she’s from some unfamiliar part of Australia but is in fact from Derby. Learn something every day.

Posted in language, neep-neep | Leave a comment

shiny!

If this is to be believed, Serenity will open on April 22.

Later: Or not.

Posted in cinema | Leave a comment

department of spoof advertising

The Diebold Variations

Posted in politics | Leave a comment

vital details

I’ve just seen the end of Angel‘s third season, and what a startling revelation! Who’d have thought that Cordelia would drive a yellow Jeep?!

Posted in cinema | Leave a comment

the art of astronomy

Minor planet (21656) Knuth (cited by ACB)

Posted in sciences | Leave a comment

the price of life

No comment on the thesis of “The economic logic of executing computer hackers” (Slate; cited by ACB), but this caught my eye:

When we say that a human life is worth $10 million, we mean nothing more or less than this: A typical person, faced with a 1-in-10-million chance of death, seems to be willing to pay about a dollar to eliminate that risk. We know this not from theory but from observation – by looking, for example, at the size of the pay cuts people are willing to take to move into safer jobs. On this basis, Harvard professor Kip Viscusi estimates the value of a life at $4.5 million overall, $7 million for a blue-collar male and $8.5 million for a blue collar female. (Viscusi acknowledges that it’s puzzling for a blue-collar life to be worth more than a white-collar life, but that’s what the data show.)

Perhaps white-collar workers, unfamiliar with the concept of death on the job, underestimate its likelihood.

Posted in economics | Leave a comment