secession, anyone?

Joe Sobran’s view of Lincoln is more charitable than that of (say) Neil Smith or Thomas DiLorenzo, not that that’s saying much, but he still calls the war a tragic blunder.

Given the timing of that column (October 7), I wonder whether Sobran had the same thought as I, that the recent polarization of our politics should make talk of secession more palatable to the mainstream.

Posted in constitution, history | Leave a comment

QotD

Thomas Babington Macaulay, quoted in The Economist Oct.30 p.48

If men are to wait for liberty till they become good and wise in slavery, they may indeed wait forever.

Posted in history, politics | Leave a comment

context counts

headline of the week: Warriors lock up young veterans

Posted in language | Leave a comment

a good notation is a good start

In keying data from handwritten forms, I’m struck by how badly our digits are designed: there are few pairs for which I haven’t seen an ambiguous case.

I do write somewhat defensively. I write ‘9’ with a single stroke, like ‘6’, so that it cannot be mistaken for ‘4’. I usually write ‘8’ as two circles rather than in a single stroke, so that it cannot become ‘5’ by malformation of the upstroke, nor become ‘9’ by rising too early from the lower loop. By some quirk I tend to begin ‘0’ (and ‘Oo’) by rising from the lower right, so it cannot become ‘6’.

Posted in language | Leave a comment

of course it leaks

In the basement of the Alameda County courthouse, where I’ve been working, there’s a sign announcing that it’s a felony to bring in weapons including knives longer than four inches. Must be an old sign; nowadays I imagine they’d seize the one-inch souvenir penknife that I bought as a child in Toledo. Can I be alone in wondering how a foot-long bread-knife got into the kitchen of the Registrar of Voters?

Saturday morning I was informally admitted to the building before the screeners showed up. “Dang, I coulda brought my guns!”

Posted in security theater | 1 Comment

oh goody, an obscure question of common law

(This item was written in October but somehow never got out of “draft” status.)

Constructive Trusts and Restitution After Theft: Rasmusen discusses a legal quandary.

It hits me that this item calls for a law category not under politics. I’m surprised that this is the first such.

Posted in law | Leave a comment

are they trying to be killfiled?

I’m the gatekeeper for two small mailing-lists. For months now, nearly all the spam submitted to those lists comes from addresses of the form word21word@hotmail.com — e.g. in the latest batch chance21sunbird, church21lorraine, cougars21molly1, pedro21bridge. Why?

Posted in spam | Leave a comment