Monthly Archives: November 2004

maybe it shoulda been called the Kallikak monkey trial

Inherit the Wind somehow never mentioned that the evilutionist textbook used by John Scopes was racist and eugenist. Jim Lindgren, Volokh Conspirator, has the story.

Posted in race, religion, sciences | Leave a comment

the L-word

About a decade ago, someone or other wrote in The Nation advocating that the Left reclaim the word populist. I was tempted to send a letter asking whether, in that case, we individualists could have liberal back. The Economist, in … Continue reading

Posted in language, politics | Leave a comment

QotD

H L Mencken, quoted by David Friedman in the December issue of Liberty In nothing did the founders of this country so demonstrate their essential naïveté than in attempting to constrain government from all of its favorite abuses, and entrusting … Continue reading

Posted in constitution | Leave a comment

mis-checked spelling of the month

carob nanotubes

Posted in language | Leave a comment

duelling policies

Mark A R Kleiman says a number of sane things, but also this: Requiring everyone who wants to have a gun to apply for a discretionary permit . . . serves no good purpose that I can see. The same … Continue reading

Posted in politics, weapons | 1 Comment

The Incredibles . .

. . is totally swell. I shall have to see it again. Fannish notes: In one brief shot we see what looks like the personal fliers of L Neil Smith’s Pallas. Two bystanders could be Lee & Kirby, or not.

Posted in cinema | 2 Comments

it’s easy for puppets to keep a straight face

Astonishing language for children’s television. I knew British television was more liberal, but really! (cited by Nev Dull) Later same day: Er well sorta. Here’s the straight dope.

Posted in humanities | Leave a comment