Category Archives: humanities

mis-checked spelling of the month

carob nanotubes

Posted in language | Leave a comment

it’s easy for puppets to keep a straight face

Astonishing language for children’s television. I knew British television was more liberal, but really! (cited by Nev Dull) Later same day: Er well sorta. Here’s the straight dope.

Posted in humanities | Leave a comment

secession, anyone?

Joe Sobran’s view of Lincoln is more charitable than that of (say) Neil Smith or Thomas DiLorenzo, not that that’s saying much, but he still calls the war a tragic blunder. Given the timing of that column (October 7), I … Continue reading

Posted in constitution, history | Leave a comment

QotD

Thomas Babington Macaulay, quoted in The Economist Oct.30 p.48 If men are to wait for liberty till they become good and wise in slavery, they may indeed wait forever.

Posted in history, politics | Leave a comment

context counts

headline of the week: Warriors lock up young veterans

Posted in language | Leave a comment

a good notation is a good start

In keying data from handwritten forms, I’m struck by how badly our digits are designed: there are few pairs for which I haven’t seen an ambiguous case. I do write somewhat defensively. I write ‘9’ with a single stroke, like … Continue reading

Posted in language | Leave a comment

oh goody, an obscure question of common law

(This item was written in October but somehow never got out of “draft” status.) Constructive Trusts and Restitution After Theft: Rasmusen discusses a legal quandary. It hits me that this item calls for a law category not under politics. I’m … Continue reading

Posted in law | Leave a comment