carob nanotubes

Astonishing language for children’s television. I knew British television was more liberal, but really! (cited by Nev Dull)

Later same day: Er well sorta. Here’s the straight dope.

Joe Sobran’s view of Lincoln is more charitable than that of (say) Neil Smith or Thomas DiLorenzo, not that that’s saying much, but he still calls the war a tragic blunder.

Given the timing of that column (October 7), I wonder whether Sobran had the same thought as I, that the recent polarization of our politics should make talk of secession more palatable to the mainstream.

Thomas Babington Macaulay, quoted in The Economist Oct.30 p.48

If men are to wait for liberty till they become good and wise in slavery, they may indeed wait forever.

headline of the week: Warriors lock up young veterans

In keying data from handwritten forms, I’m struck by how badly our digits are designed: there are few pairs for which I haven’t seen an ambiguous case.

I do write somewhat defensively. I write ‘9’ with a single stroke, like ‘6’, so that it cannot be mistaken for ‘4’. I usually write ‘8’ as two circles rather than in a single stroke, so that it cannot become ‘5’ by malformation of the upstroke, nor become ‘9’ by rising too early from the lower loop. By some quirk I tend to begin ‘0’ (and ‘Oo’) by rising from the lower right, so it cannot become ‘6’.

(This item was written in October but somehow never got out of “draft” status.)

Constructive Trusts and Restitution After Theft: Rasmusen discusses a legal quandary.

It hits me that this item calls for a law category not under politics. I’m surprised that this is the first such.