Putting on my constitutional minarchist hat for a moment . .<\/p>\n
The White House and its apologists have often claimed (successfully) that the US Constitution does not restrict its actions outside US borders. I argue in response that, since the US Govt’s authority (if any) is derived through the Constitution, wherever the Constitution does not apply no such authority can exist.<\/p>\n
If I were President I’d obviously shut down Camp X and order an end to “rendition”. I was about to say I’d decree a policy that we don’t do anything by proxy that we could not legally do ourselves within the US — but something is scratching at a distant corner of my mind, as if I’m forgetting something.<\/p>\n
Can you think of any exceptions to such a policy that would pass the filter of minarchist ethics?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Putting on my constitutional minarchist hat for a moment . . The White House and its apologists have often claimed (successfully) that the US Constitution does not restrict its actions outside US borders. I argue in response that, since the US … Continue reading